"For physical training is of some value, but godliness has value for all things, holding promise for both the present life and the life to come." -1 Timothy 4:8
I just finished talking to a friend of mine who was headed home from the gym. He sounded WAY more awake than I, and there was an excitement in his voice. There are few better ways to start a morning than by working out or running or doing some kind of exercise. It rejuvenates the mind and soul and seems to kick-start your engine for the day. It seems like you have a better outlook for the whole day when you start it the right way.
The same holds true for our personal relationship with Christ. Timothy compares godliness to training or working out. In fact, in the verse prior (4:7) he says plainly, "Train yourself to be godly" (NIV).
I think the NASB probably captures the heart of the issue best: "Discipline yourself for the purpose of godliness." We are preparing ourselves for the sanctifying work of God (which is godliness) by disciplining ourselves. In other words, we become disciplined... God makes us godly.
Some of us might be tempted to ignore either the personal discipline or the God-empowered sanctification side of things. My tendency is to think that godliness is mostly an act of the will, as if I could attain it if I were to just rise a little earlier every morning and read a few extra Bible verses, watch a little less TV, or talk a little less smack on the soccer field. :)
Others may struggle with thinking that attaining godliness is entirely the work of God and that man has no responsibility in the matter. This would be an unfortunate error as well.
Timothy says, "Train!" Work hard, and add an extra five pounds to the bench press every once in a while. Grow deeper, seek harder, and listen more intently. Find the truths of the Word of God to be more convicting and more encouraging each day.
From a practical standpoint, I truly would encourage everyone to seek the Lord, when possible, early on in your day. I know that we're not all moring people, and I don't believe that the Scriptures command a certain time of day to be invested in devotional time. But, speaking from personal experience, it is always better for me to give God the "first fruits" of my day. It is always better for me to seek His kingdom and His righteousness first each day, before the distractions of the flesh and the world begin to draw me in.
There is a certain measureable difference in my day when I devote the first part of it to the Lord. Perhaps you would find the same to be true in your life. It's a lot like my friend that I talked to this morning who sounded more awake and ready to take on the challenges of the day than I. There's nothing like a little spiritual exercise to get started on the right foot.
In Christ,
Andy
Friday, October 15, 2010
Sunday, September 26, 2010
We Need Each Other
As we read from Acts chapter two in Sunday School this morning, I was reminded in a profound way of the value that I should be placing on the body of Christ, my church.
The recurring theme of Acts 2:42-47 is unity among believers:
1. "They" devoted themselves to the teaching
2. Breaking bread together
3. They were together
4. They had all things in common
5. They were selling possessions to give away
6. They met at the temple "together"
7. They broke bread in their homes together
In our individualistic culture one of the most heartbreaking realities about our church experience is that there is very little "church" involved. Many of us could get the same weekly experience by watching the television or on the internet (and many do just that).
But the Bible pleads with us to set our hearts and minds on dependence upon one another. I should come to worship saying to all my brothers and sisters in Christ, “I need you…”
“I need you in order to fully understand God’s Word, because you have a perspective that I have missed.”
“I need you to understand what it means to worship God, because my appreciation for who He is and what He has done is not always what it needs to be.”
“I need you to help me understand Christ, the gospel, the cross, and the resurrection, because I continually forget all these things; and I need to see you rejoice over them so that I can remember.”
“I need you to confront me when I sin, because I say and think and do things that I don’t mean and that are harmful to me and others.”
“I need you to encourage me, and I need to encourage you because about half of the time one of us is struggling or in pain.”
Dependency, by nature, means vulnerability, and vulnerability means that I CAN get hurt. I CAN feel pain if I let these people in. I CAN allow them access to the deep and sensitive places in my heart. We think of all the things that COULD happen.
Oh… but this dependency upon one another is also what makes the church the church. It is what defines us as a body apart from every other gathering of people on earth. We may be vulnerable, but we also have each other’s backs… no matter what.
Once I have allowed my weaknesses into the light in the presence of another brother or sister, you can bet that I will automatically be able to sympathize with theirs. In this case, there is no judgment or condemnation or really even hypocrisy… because we are honest enough to never pretend that we have it all together.
Oh God, give us a vision of unity that transcends all that this culture has taught us. Teach us to be the church, founded upon the gospel of Jesus Christ, learning together, growing together, and bringing more people into this amazing fellowship.
In Christ,
Andy
The recurring theme of Acts 2:42-47 is unity among believers:
1. "They" devoted themselves to the teaching
2. Breaking bread together
3. They were together
4. They had all things in common
5. They were selling possessions to give away
6. They met at the temple "together"
7. They broke bread in their homes together
In our individualistic culture one of the most heartbreaking realities about our church experience is that there is very little "church" involved. Many of us could get the same weekly experience by watching the television or on the internet (and many do just that).
But the Bible pleads with us to set our hearts and minds on dependence upon one another. I should come to worship saying to all my brothers and sisters in Christ, “I need you…”
“I need you in order to fully understand God’s Word, because you have a perspective that I have missed.”
“I need you to understand what it means to worship God, because my appreciation for who He is and what He has done is not always what it needs to be.”
“I need you to help me understand Christ, the gospel, the cross, and the resurrection, because I continually forget all these things; and I need to see you rejoice over them so that I can remember.”
“I need you to confront me when I sin, because I say and think and do things that I don’t mean and that are harmful to me and others.”
“I need you to encourage me, and I need to encourage you because about half of the time one of us is struggling or in pain.”
Dependency, by nature, means vulnerability, and vulnerability means that I CAN get hurt. I CAN feel pain if I let these people in. I CAN allow them access to the deep and sensitive places in my heart. We think of all the things that COULD happen.
Oh… but this dependency upon one another is also what makes the church the church. It is what defines us as a body apart from every other gathering of people on earth. We may be vulnerable, but we also have each other’s backs… no matter what.
Once I have allowed my weaknesses into the light in the presence of another brother or sister, you can bet that I will automatically be able to sympathize with theirs. In this case, there is no judgment or condemnation or really even hypocrisy… because we are honest enough to never pretend that we have it all together.
Oh God, give us a vision of unity that transcends all that this culture has taught us. Teach us to be the church, founded upon the gospel of Jesus Christ, learning together, growing together, and bringing more people into this amazing fellowship.
In Christ,
Andy
Friday, September 24, 2010
Allowing Our Kids to Learn to Trust God
Today I heard a parent say something that I've rarely (if ever) heard. When referring to a season of spiritual searching that their child is going through, this parent said something to this effect: "We want him to be able to ask questions and be in situations where God becomes all that he can rely on... because God ultimately is all that we can rely on."
What a brave and daring statement. Most parents only wish for comfort and safety for their children, spiritually speaking and otherwise. What this parent was saying, in effect, was that their child's ability to trust in God was more important to them than their ease of conscience or mind. They were encouraging a struggle... even pain.
It is sure that no parent can desire pain for their child, but by trusting in the sovereignty of our almighty God, we begin to understand that the temporary fleshly pains of faith questions are much more bearable than the long-term trails of a faith crisis.
So, we as parents, seem to be faced with a choice as our children move toward adulthood. We can continually give them quick answers to their questions about God and the faith, not allowing them to test it themselves, and ultimately not trusting that God will hold them in His care throughout the process, OR we can probe, ask more questions, and gently lead them toward the places where they will find the answers for themselves.
This is a subtle and difficult art in shaping the spiritual lives of students.
In Christ,
Andy
What a brave and daring statement. Most parents only wish for comfort and safety for their children, spiritually speaking and otherwise. What this parent was saying, in effect, was that their child's ability to trust in God was more important to them than their ease of conscience or mind. They were encouraging a struggle... even pain.
It is sure that no parent can desire pain for their child, but by trusting in the sovereignty of our almighty God, we begin to understand that the temporary fleshly pains of faith questions are much more bearable than the long-term trails of a faith crisis.
So, we as parents, seem to be faced with a choice as our children move toward adulthood. We can continually give them quick answers to their questions about God and the faith, not allowing them to test it themselves, and ultimately not trusting that God will hold them in His care throughout the process, OR we can probe, ask more questions, and gently lead them toward the places where they will find the answers for themselves.
This is a subtle and difficult art in shaping the spiritual lives of students.
In Christ,
Andy
Thursday, August 19, 2010
Priests
"For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave Hiself as a ransom for all, the testimony given at the proper time." -1 Timothy 2:5-6
"For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin." -Hebrews 4:15
I've been reading in Hebrews lately, and there is a MAJOR concept that the book presents that I feel is so timeless and crucial. It has to do with priests.
One of Hebrews' arguments is that Christ is of the order of Melchizedek (which we will NOT get into today) and that this order is higher than the order of Aaron. In a nutshell, Mel came during the time of Abraham and represents a pre-law "better" way of doing things.
The tendency of man is to present for himself priests. When the primal instincts take over and cultic rituals begin to develop in a heathen culture, certain leaders among them seem to always become priests. These men lead in sacrifices and demonic rituals. They represent a sort of mediator between the spirit world and the physical. In some cases we even call them "mediums."
This tendency is not limited to uncivilized or ancient cultures. Even among the world's most long-enduring religions, we find priests at the center. Men are looking for those among them who will speak to god or the gods and bring forth his/their messages.
It reminds me of the attitude of the people of Israel in Exodus 20 when they heard God speak to all of them. They couldn't handle it. They said to Moses, "Speak to us yourself and we will listen; but let not God speak to us, or we will die."
Now it is not my place to speculate, but could it be that God's BEST for Israel was this direct, personal communication? Perhaps in Exodus 20 we are getting a beautiful glimpse into what God's heart desired: The giving of the 10 Commandments in an audible voice in such a way that each man was accountable directly to God Himself. I guess the question is irrelevant since God knew that the people would reject His direct, personal communication. And so began the creation of a priesthood that was (according to Hebrews) inferior from the start.
I guess my point today is that we, in a church where tongues of fire (the Spirit) have fallen on each individual (see Acts 2), still struggle with trying to set up priests for ourselves. We tend to think that the youth pastor or pastor or Sunday School teacher or famous speaker or band has a corner on God that is special. It's like they are naturally closer to Him or something. Like they can hear and see things that us "regular folks" can't.
Forunately, 1 Timothy makes is clear that now things are undeniably different. There is now only ONE MEDIATOR between God and man, Jesus Christ, who is both fully God and fully man. No other man will or may act in the place of priest for us. We all have a direct line to God Himself through the blood of Christ. But there is no need to fear, for our mediator has suffered in every way that we have, yet without sin, making Him the perfectly acceptable sacrifice, as well as the priest who offers it, all at the same time. This is gospel. God now dwells in the hearts of men through His Holy Spirit, and we can all bodly approach the throne of grace with confidence.
In Christ,
Andy
"For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted in all things as we are, yet without sin." -Hebrews 4:15
I've been reading in Hebrews lately, and there is a MAJOR concept that the book presents that I feel is so timeless and crucial. It has to do with priests.
One of Hebrews' arguments is that Christ is of the order of Melchizedek (which we will NOT get into today) and that this order is higher than the order of Aaron. In a nutshell, Mel came during the time of Abraham and represents a pre-law "better" way of doing things.
The tendency of man is to present for himself priests. When the primal instincts take over and cultic rituals begin to develop in a heathen culture, certain leaders among them seem to always become priests. These men lead in sacrifices and demonic rituals. They represent a sort of mediator between the spirit world and the physical. In some cases we even call them "mediums."
This tendency is not limited to uncivilized or ancient cultures. Even among the world's most long-enduring religions, we find priests at the center. Men are looking for those among them who will speak to god or the gods and bring forth his/their messages.
It reminds me of the attitude of the people of Israel in Exodus 20 when they heard God speak to all of them. They couldn't handle it. They said to Moses, "Speak to us yourself and we will listen; but let not God speak to us, or we will die."
Now it is not my place to speculate, but could it be that God's BEST for Israel was this direct, personal communication? Perhaps in Exodus 20 we are getting a beautiful glimpse into what God's heart desired: The giving of the 10 Commandments in an audible voice in such a way that each man was accountable directly to God Himself. I guess the question is irrelevant since God knew that the people would reject His direct, personal communication. And so began the creation of a priesthood that was (according to Hebrews) inferior from the start.
I guess my point today is that we, in a church where tongues of fire (the Spirit) have fallen on each individual (see Acts 2), still struggle with trying to set up priests for ourselves. We tend to think that the youth pastor or pastor or Sunday School teacher or famous speaker or band has a corner on God that is special. It's like they are naturally closer to Him or something. Like they can hear and see things that us "regular folks" can't.
Forunately, 1 Timothy makes is clear that now things are undeniably different. There is now only ONE MEDIATOR between God and man, Jesus Christ, who is both fully God and fully man. No other man will or may act in the place of priest for us. We all have a direct line to God Himself through the blood of Christ. But there is no need to fear, for our mediator has suffered in every way that we have, yet without sin, making Him the perfectly acceptable sacrifice, as well as the priest who offers it, all at the same time. This is gospel. God now dwells in the hearts of men through His Holy Spirit, and we can all bodly approach the throne of grace with confidence.
In Christ,
Andy
Saturday, August 7, 2010
Laboring in Prayer ... for Others
"Epaphras, who is one of your number, a bondslave of Jesus Christ, sends you his greetings, always laboring earnestly for you in his prayers, that you may stand perfect and fully assured in all the will of God."
-Colossians 4:12 (NASB)
How often do we LABOR in prayer?
In our current entertainment-driven, microwave-everything society, we expect prayer to, at least, be something said before dinner or bed and, at most, an instant emotional/spiritual gratification for our soul. We expect to be rewarded immediately for simply giving God our time, as if He owed us that much.
But this verse recounts the story of a man, Epaphras, who is constantly in prayer for his brethren in Christ. Notice that Epaphras' type of prayer is a LABOR. It is not easy. It is not comfortable or probably even (initially) very fulfilling. Think of how we usually experience toil: I think of the image of a farmer. There is the difficult work of preparing the ground, the difficult work of planting the seed, and the difficult work of maintaining the integrity of the crop through watering and weeding. And all of this takes MONTHS to bring forth fruit. I know many a parent who has labored for YEARS on behalf of a child. I have sewn seeds of prayer for lost friends that still remain dormant years later. I believe that these seeds will one day bring forth fruit in due season.
Paul says that the purpose of this labor is that his fellow believers would "stand perfect" and be "fully assured in all the will of God." Epaphras wants his brothers to stand unwavering, not shaken by the world around them. Essentially, he is asking the Father for a part of sanctification ON BEHALF of another person. How wonderful is the work of redemption and salvation even through others on our behalf. This reminds me of the verse in 1 John that states: "If anyone sees his brother committing a sin not leading to death, he shall ask and God will for him give life to those who commit sin not leading to death" (16). We don't have time to explore what exactly he means by "sin not leading to death," but suffice it to say that God does call us to a very active part even in the sanctification of other believers through prayer.
Epaphras also desires that they know ALL of the will of God. It is interesting the way that Paul states that last piece of information. It is almost as if believers could possibly know (and be assured in) PART of the will of God while still missing some of it. Epaphras' labor in prayer is the work of an intercessor. He is pleading with the Father that these people not miss ANY of His perfect will for their lives, the church, and the gospel.
It is not often that I could claim to have labored in prayer. And, of the few times that I could make such a statment, the labors have been mostly for myself, my problems, my future, and my struggles. But Epaphras is laboring for the sake of OTHERS. What a beautiful picture. I hope we can all be encourged by his example. And more than that, I hope that we can all learn to follow his example by taking the time and effort to LABOR in prayer... for others.
-Colossians 4:12 (NASB)
How often do we LABOR in prayer?
In our current entertainment-driven, microwave-everything society, we expect prayer to, at least, be something said before dinner or bed and, at most, an instant emotional/spiritual gratification for our soul. We expect to be rewarded immediately for simply giving God our time, as if He owed us that much.
But this verse recounts the story of a man, Epaphras, who is constantly in prayer for his brethren in Christ. Notice that Epaphras' type of prayer is a LABOR. It is not easy. It is not comfortable or probably even (initially) very fulfilling. Think of how we usually experience toil: I think of the image of a farmer. There is the difficult work of preparing the ground, the difficult work of planting the seed, and the difficult work of maintaining the integrity of the crop through watering and weeding. And all of this takes MONTHS to bring forth fruit. I know many a parent who has labored for YEARS on behalf of a child. I have sewn seeds of prayer for lost friends that still remain dormant years later. I believe that these seeds will one day bring forth fruit in due season.
Paul says that the purpose of this labor is that his fellow believers would "stand perfect" and be "fully assured in all the will of God." Epaphras wants his brothers to stand unwavering, not shaken by the world around them. Essentially, he is asking the Father for a part of sanctification ON BEHALF of another person. How wonderful is the work of redemption and salvation even through others on our behalf. This reminds me of the verse in 1 John that states: "If anyone sees his brother committing a sin not leading to death, he shall ask and God will for him give life to those who commit sin not leading to death" (16). We don't have time to explore what exactly he means by "sin not leading to death," but suffice it to say that God does call us to a very active part even in the sanctification of other believers through prayer.
Epaphras also desires that they know ALL of the will of God. It is interesting the way that Paul states that last piece of information. It is almost as if believers could possibly know (and be assured in) PART of the will of God while still missing some of it. Epaphras' labor in prayer is the work of an intercessor. He is pleading with the Father that these people not miss ANY of His perfect will for their lives, the church, and the gospel.
It is not often that I could claim to have labored in prayer. And, of the few times that I could make such a statment, the labors have been mostly for myself, my problems, my future, and my struggles. But Epaphras is laboring for the sake of OTHERS. What a beautiful picture. I hope we can all be encourged by his example. And more than that, I hope that we can all learn to follow his example by taking the time and effort to LABOR in prayer... for others.
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Set Your Mind
The Bible makes a big deal about how we use our minds. Christ commands us (quoting Deuteronomy) to love the Lord with all of our mind. The stuff that we put into our minds has a lasting affect on the way we live or lives.
Colossians 3:2 says to, "Set your mind on things above, not on things that are on the earth." I believe that Paul is (as is his usual custom) comparing those things which are of the flesh (and temporary) with those things which are of the Spirit (and are eternal). Paul is encouraging us to SET our minds on those things which are eternal. Setting is an act of the will. This implies two things: 1.We do have a choice as to where we focus our attention, and 2.We do have the ability to focus our attention on the right things. We are not hopeless victims of circumstance (no matter how bad the circumstance). We can choose to have faith, exhibit patience, and embrace love for others regardless of the distractions around us.
Have you ever had an amazing worship or spiritual experience? Have you ever wished it would just last forever? Do you wonder why it doesn't? Now I'm sure that experiences are not made to last (just read 1 Corinthians 13 - these things will all pass away with time). But I believe there is an element of encouragement, contentment, joy, and peace that we receive from communion with God and other believers that IS intended to last. So, how do we maintain this?
Think of it this way: When we leave a place of worship (or a mindset of worship) and immediately begin to joke around with our friends about earthly things, particularly things that border on sin, we begin to set our minds on things related to this earth, things that are temporary. It is no doubt that our heavenly vision is blurred when we so quickly allow our gaze to return to damnable and destructive thoughts and conversations. I've seen it a thousand times... even in my own life.
I used to go to a worship service in Atlanta called 7:22. On Tuesday nights we would have some of the most amazing times of worship together with other believers. But only ten minutes after these services, at the local Steak-and-Shake, I would find myself indulging in conversation littered with (at best) pop-culture nonsense and (at worst) godless chatter.
Now I don't mean to be a fuddy-dud (not sure on the correct spelling there :). It's not like we can constantly be quoting Scripture to one another or in a state of prayer. I'm not sure God desires that we be, as one person said, "so heavenly minded that we are no earthly good." The point is really about our mindset. Is our Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit always invited wherever our minds, mouths, and feet take us? OR, are there parts of our lives from which we try to keep them away?
Can I really spend 6 hours in front of a TV or Computer Screen and remain focused on the Gospel? Can someone really spend a whole day playing video games and remain in communion with the Father? Can I really speak harmfully to a brother or sister in Christ and expect God to hear my prayers? Can someone constantly engage in a fleshly lifestyle and expect to find rewards in heaven?
"For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace." -Romans 8:6
I don't know about you, but my goal is find and keep that life and that peace.
In Christ,
Andy
Colossians 3:2 says to, "Set your mind on things above, not on things that are on the earth." I believe that Paul is (as is his usual custom) comparing those things which are of the flesh (and temporary) with those things which are of the Spirit (and are eternal). Paul is encouraging us to SET our minds on those things which are eternal. Setting is an act of the will. This implies two things: 1.We do have a choice as to where we focus our attention, and 2.We do have the ability to focus our attention on the right things. We are not hopeless victims of circumstance (no matter how bad the circumstance). We can choose to have faith, exhibit patience, and embrace love for others regardless of the distractions around us.
Have you ever had an amazing worship or spiritual experience? Have you ever wished it would just last forever? Do you wonder why it doesn't? Now I'm sure that experiences are not made to last (just read 1 Corinthians 13 - these things will all pass away with time). But I believe there is an element of encouragement, contentment, joy, and peace that we receive from communion with God and other believers that IS intended to last. So, how do we maintain this?
Think of it this way: When we leave a place of worship (or a mindset of worship) and immediately begin to joke around with our friends about earthly things, particularly things that border on sin, we begin to set our minds on things related to this earth, things that are temporary. It is no doubt that our heavenly vision is blurred when we so quickly allow our gaze to return to damnable and destructive thoughts and conversations. I've seen it a thousand times... even in my own life.
I used to go to a worship service in Atlanta called 7:22. On Tuesday nights we would have some of the most amazing times of worship together with other believers. But only ten minutes after these services, at the local Steak-and-Shake, I would find myself indulging in conversation littered with (at best) pop-culture nonsense and (at worst) godless chatter.
Now I don't mean to be a fuddy-dud (not sure on the correct spelling there :). It's not like we can constantly be quoting Scripture to one another or in a state of prayer. I'm not sure God desires that we be, as one person said, "so heavenly minded that we are no earthly good." The point is really about our mindset. Is our Father, Christ, and the Holy Spirit always invited wherever our minds, mouths, and feet take us? OR, are there parts of our lives from which we try to keep them away?
Can I really spend 6 hours in front of a TV or Computer Screen and remain focused on the Gospel? Can someone really spend a whole day playing video games and remain in communion with the Father? Can I really speak harmfully to a brother or sister in Christ and expect God to hear my prayers? Can someone constantly engage in a fleshly lifestyle and expect to find rewards in heaven?
"For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace." -Romans 8:6
I don't know about you, but my goal is find and keep that life and that peace.
In Christ,
Andy
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Obedience IS Love
In Matthew 22:37, Jesus said that the greatest commandment is to LOVE GOD with all that we are. 1 John 3:16 tells us that WE KNOW WHAT LOVE IS because of Jesus' sacrificial death on the cross. John 3:16 helps us to know that GOD LOVES THE WHOLE WORLD so much that He sent Jesus to make that sacrifice so that we would not be condemned but accepted as sons and daughters of God.
And then... in John 14:15 Jesus says a strange thing: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments."
I honestly expected Him to say, "If you love me you'll have great affection for me." And I expected this because of the culture in which I live. My culture tells me that love is equivalent with emotion and affection. It also doesn't help that one of my primary means of expressing love is through affection. I love to cuddle with Chloe and kiss on Heather and wrestle with Eduke. So much of what LOVE is to me is affection, and, I don't believe that there is anything outright wrong with this.
But Jesus said that when we think of expressing love toward Him, the primary means (at least in this passage) is not affection or emotion, but obedience. I'm not sure that I get this completely, until I start looking at those passages above again.
If the greatest commandment is to LOVE GOD, and the second, which is to love our neighbors as ourselves, is "like unto it," then the two are undoubtedly deeply connected. There is no command of God that does not fall under the realms of Loving God and Loving others. And so, our obedience to the commands of God are part and parcel with love itself.
1 John 3:16 and John 3:16 recound the sacrifice of Christ that has brought us life. I don't know for certain, but I do not see affection as the greatest reason for Christ's decision to allow Himself to be captured and tortured to death. For certain, I know that His affections for us were greater than we can imagine as he hung there and cried "forgive them, for they know not what they do," but in the end it was obedience to the Father that drove Him to the cross. Love and obedience were one in the same.
And so, Jesus tells us that to love Him is to obey Him. This should be comforting for us whose emotions seem to run rampant at times. In those hours when affection for the Father seems the farthest thing from our minds, obedience to the Father is still more than possible. And when simple obedience is all that we can muster day in and day out, maybe for months on end, we can remember that Jesus says this IS LOVE for Him.
Of course, I probably need to clarify a bit. Obedience with a rotten attitude is not true obedience, and, in my opinion, we should always strive to maintain our affection for the Lord. All I am saying is that we need not equate affection and emotion with love, especially when it comes to our relationship with God. Great moments of closeness are needed and appreciated bonuses, but they are not requirements.
Brothers and Sisters, let us learn to OBEY understanding that OBEDIENCE... IS... LOVE.
In Christ,
Andy
And then... in John 14:15 Jesus says a strange thing: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments."
I honestly expected Him to say, "If you love me you'll have great affection for me." And I expected this because of the culture in which I live. My culture tells me that love is equivalent with emotion and affection. It also doesn't help that one of my primary means of expressing love is through affection. I love to cuddle with Chloe and kiss on Heather and wrestle with Eduke. So much of what LOVE is to me is affection, and, I don't believe that there is anything outright wrong with this.
But Jesus said that when we think of expressing love toward Him, the primary means (at least in this passage) is not affection or emotion, but obedience. I'm not sure that I get this completely, until I start looking at those passages above again.
If the greatest commandment is to LOVE GOD, and the second, which is to love our neighbors as ourselves, is "like unto it," then the two are undoubtedly deeply connected. There is no command of God that does not fall under the realms of Loving God and Loving others. And so, our obedience to the commands of God are part and parcel with love itself.
1 John 3:16 and John 3:16 recound the sacrifice of Christ that has brought us life. I don't know for certain, but I do not see affection as the greatest reason for Christ's decision to allow Himself to be captured and tortured to death. For certain, I know that His affections for us were greater than we can imagine as he hung there and cried "forgive them, for they know not what they do," but in the end it was obedience to the Father that drove Him to the cross. Love and obedience were one in the same.
And so, Jesus tells us that to love Him is to obey Him. This should be comforting for us whose emotions seem to run rampant at times. In those hours when affection for the Father seems the farthest thing from our minds, obedience to the Father is still more than possible. And when simple obedience is all that we can muster day in and day out, maybe for months on end, we can remember that Jesus says this IS LOVE for Him.
Of course, I probably need to clarify a bit. Obedience with a rotten attitude is not true obedience, and, in my opinion, we should always strive to maintain our affection for the Lord. All I am saying is that we need not equate affection and emotion with love, especially when it comes to our relationship with God. Great moments of closeness are needed and appreciated bonuses, but they are not requirements.
Brothers and Sisters, let us learn to OBEY understanding that OBEDIENCE... IS... LOVE.
In Christ,
Andy
Thursday, July 8, 2010
Means and Ends
It's so hard for believers to continually remind ourselves that life is not about destinations or even really about the journey but rather the One with whom we are walking. How often we must insult our Lord when this or that accomplishment or activity is out in front of us and we give that thing prominence in our lives. All of a sudden we make God (who should be the end/goal/aim) into our means and the thing (which is, in the eternal perspective, most irrelevant) into the goal or the end. I struggle with this daily.
Undoubtedly, this is the reason for so much discontentment in our lives. It is the reason for such a lack of peace, joy, and contentment. When the only Source of peace, joy, and contentment is degraded to become used as a tool, we will only find disappointment.
May we seek to keep our relationship with Christ at the center of our purpose. May we stop allowing ourselves to simply use Him as a means to our own ends. May we deny all else for the sake of knowing Him and the power of His resurrection and sharing in the fellowship of His sufferings (see Philippians 3:10).
In Christ,
Andy
Undoubtedly, this is the reason for so much discontentment in our lives. It is the reason for such a lack of peace, joy, and contentment. When the only Source of peace, joy, and contentment is degraded to become used as a tool, we will only find disappointment.
May we seek to keep our relationship with Christ at the center of our purpose. May we stop allowing ourselves to simply use Him as a means to our own ends. May we deny all else for the sake of knowing Him and the power of His resurrection and sharing in the fellowship of His sufferings (see Philippians 3:10).
In Christ,
Andy
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
A Glimpse of the Invisible Church: Missions
Ever been on a mission trip? Ever been on one where you didn't know anyone else there? Those may just be the best kind. All comforts have been removed, even social ones. It's on trips like these that I think I've gotten a glimpse of the true, what Augustine called "invisible," church. On a couple of trips I've been with people from all over the country. Different cultures, different perspectives, and different experiences that they brought to the table. I find it enlightening to think about how much unity there was in such a diverse group. Kindness and grace was abundant. It seems as if everyone was just looking for ways to encourage and find the good in their teammates.
But on one particularly long trip I found that within 5 weeks or so we began to get comfortable with each other. Then small irritations started happening, followed by conflicts. Now, I'm not so idealistic as to think that we can rid the human race (or even the church) of selfish conflict, but I think there is an important lesson to be had in this story.
Whatever our individual motivations, when the trip began, we were thinking of our other teammates. How can we encourage? How can we learn about them? What do they like/dislike? Who is this person? And, in affect, almost subconsciously we were NOT thinking about ourselves by being genuinely interested in others.
What if we could capture this same grace and encouragement in the local church? What if our inclinations were toward considering others before ourselves when we met together as the body of Christ?
My experience has been that some truly do exhibit such a Christlike attitude while others find the frailty of other believers too disappointing and either (in most cases) disconnect from true, meaningful relationships, or they become cold and contentious. It is a sad reality that much of the church today is missing out on one of the most fulfilling activities God has ever created. It's Acts 2 fellowship. It's selfless and truly loving.
Brothers and sisters, let us take on this attitude of Christ and speak to one another with love that comes out of a pure heart. If you've never experienced such relationships, I would challenge you (no matter your age) to go on a mission trip that takes you away from all your comforts, especially your social ones. Then come home and live it out in your local body of believers.
In Christ,
Andy
But on one particularly long trip I found that within 5 weeks or so we began to get comfortable with each other. Then small irritations started happening, followed by conflicts. Now, I'm not so idealistic as to think that we can rid the human race (or even the church) of selfish conflict, but I think there is an important lesson to be had in this story.
Whatever our individual motivations, when the trip began, we were thinking of our other teammates. How can we encourage? How can we learn about them? What do they like/dislike? Who is this person? And, in affect, almost subconsciously we were NOT thinking about ourselves by being genuinely interested in others.
What if we could capture this same grace and encouragement in the local church? What if our inclinations were toward considering others before ourselves when we met together as the body of Christ?
My experience has been that some truly do exhibit such a Christlike attitude while others find the frailty of other believers too disappointing and either (in most cases) disconnect from true, meaningful relationships, or they become cold and contentious. It is a sad reality that much of the church today is missing out on one of the most fulfilling activities God has ever created. It's Acts 2 fellowship. It's selfless and truly loving.
Brothers and sisters, let us take on this attitude of Christ and speak to one another with love that comes out of a pure heart. If you've never experienced such relationships, I would challenge you (no matter your age) to go on a mission trip that takes you away from all your comforts, especially your social ones. Then come home and live it out in your local body of believers.
In Christ,
Andy
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Serve One Another in Love
My mother always says, "If you're ever down and discouraged, go do something for someone else." I think she got this quote from her mother, and I hope my children get it from me.
Serving someone else truly is the best medicine, and not just for the other person, but especially for ourselves. When we choose to give of our time or resources for the good of another person, something otherworldly happens, another is cared for, and our spirits are lifted. This doesn't completely make sense to me. My tendency, when struggling with a question or fear, is to turn inward. I like to lock myself in my studio or go back to sleep. But, more often than not, this only compounds the problem.
The mind is limited in its understanding. The reality is that not all of our doubts and fears will receive sufficient answers, particularly in the moment we desire them most. Our emotions also are very limited. They can be a great friend in times of joy or an incredible hindrance during a struggle. But serving another person, loving as Christ loved, seems to supersede the limitations of both the mind and the emotions. Love brings clarity to the mind and balance to the emotions.
I think this is what Paul was hinting at when he said in Galatians 5:13:
"For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'"
Serving someone else truly is the best medicine, and not just for the other person, but especially for ourselves. When we choose to give of our time or resources for the good of another person, something otherworldly happens, another is cared for, and our spirits are lifted. This doesn't completely make sense to me. My tendency, when struggling with a question or fear, is to turn inward. I like to lock myself in my studio or go back to sleep. But, more often than not, this only compounds the problem.
The mind is limited in its understanding. The reality is that not all of our doubts and fears will receive sufficient answers, particularly in the moment we desire them most. Our emotions also are very limited. They can be a great friend in times of joy or an incredible hindrance during a struggle. But serving another person, loving as Christ loved, seems to supersede the limitations of both the mind and the emotions. Love brings clarity to the mind and balance to the emotions.
I think this is what Paul was hinting at when he said in Galatians 5:13:
"For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'"
Friday, April 9, 2010
His Commandments Are Not Burdensome
"For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome." -John 5:3
I've always had a difficult time with this verse... mostly because my personal experience has often not matched the truth that it protrays. More times than not I've found the commandments of God very heavy and difficult to obey. Perhaps my experience is unique, but I doubt that to be the case. I know this because I regularly talk with brothers and sisters in Christ who are either joyfully and flippantly neglecting of God's commandments or some who are genuinely trying with all their might to obey only to find frustration at every corner. I readily admit that I fall into that latter camp on occasion.
So...What are we missing? What have I been missing?
The answers to our questions are usually found in the context. John says, "For this is the LOVE of God, that we keep His commandments." There are so many descriptors that John could have used to describe our connection with obedience to the commands of God, but, in true-to-John form, He used the word "love." Why love? Why not "this is the right thing to do" or "this is righteousness"?
Perhaps John is trying to hint at the TYPE of obligation we have to God's commandments. It's not enough to merely obey God's commandment. That obedience must somehow be connected to love. And no matter how you define the word, you can't get away with the biblical reality that love is the greatest virtue, emotion, commitment, expression that a beiever can have. Love, in this case, defines our MOTIVES for obedience. Love also helps us understand why the commands are not burdensome.
Today in chapel Darrin Patrick spoke about the reality that the gospel (the love of God for us) should be the centerpoint of all our preaching, teaching, and living. It is not that we preach good sermons about hot topics and then give a gospel presentation at the end (totally disconnected from the messages themselves), but that each message we give should have as its main piont the good news of Jesus. Why is this so important? Because, according to Darrin, the gospel motivates people more than any clever points or how to?s ever could. When we are called to reflect on the reality that God (Christ) died on a cross to save us, it motivates us beyond what any self-help principles ever could.
So... back to the passage. I'm not sure that I fully understand this (or have fully grasped its application in my life), but it seems to me that true obedience is one that is motivated first and foremost by LOVE for God for His sacrifice for us. We respond in obedience not because we fear condemnation from God but rather because He went to the ultimate lengths to save us from our sin and ourselves.
I've always had a difficult time with this verse... mostly because my personal experience has often not matched the truth that it protrays. More times than not I've found the commandments of God very heavy and difficult to obey. Perhaps my experience is unique, but I doubt that to be the case. I know this because I regularly talk with brothers and sisters in Christ who are either joyfully and flippantly neglecting of God's commandments or some who are genuinely trying with all their might to obey only to find frustration at every corner. I readily admit that I fall into that latter camp on occasion.
So...What are we missing? What have I been missing?
The answers to our questions are usually found in the context. John says, "For this is the LOVE of God, that we keep His commandments." There are so many descriptors that John could have used to describe our connection with obedience to the commands of God, but, in true-to-John form, He used the word "love." Why love? Why not "this is the right thing to do" or "this is righteousness"?
Perhaps John is trying to hint at the TYPE of obligation we have to God's commandments. It's not enough to merely obey God's commandment. That obedience must somehow be connected to love. And no matter how you define the word, you can't get away with the biblical reality that love is the greatest virtue, emotion, commitment, expression that a beiever can have. Love, in this case, defines our MOTIVES for obedience. Love also helps us understand why the commands are not burdensome.
Today in chapel Darrin Patrick spoke about the reality that the gospel (the love of God for us) should be the centerpoint of all our preaching, teaching, and living. It is not that we preach good sermons about hot topics and then give a gospel presentation at the end (totally disconnected from the messages themselves), but that each message we give should have as its main piont the good news of Jesus. Why is this so important? Because, according to Darrin, the gospel motivates people more than any clever points or how to?s ever could. When we are called to reflect on the reality that God (Christ) died on a cross to save us, it motivates us beyond what any self-help principles ever could.
So... back to the passage. I'm not sure that I fully understand this (or have fully grasped its application in my life), but it seems to me that true obedience is one that is motivated first and foremost by LOVE for God for His sacrifice for us. We respond in obedience not because we fear condemnation from God but rather because He went to the ultimate lengths to save us from our sin and ourselves.
Saturday, April 3, 2010
Ezekiel 33:31-32
"And they come to you as people come, and they sit before you as my people, and they hear what you say but they will not do it; for with lustful talk in their mouths they act; their hearts is set on their gain... for they hear what you say, but they will not do it." -Ezekiel 33:31-32
I stumbled upon this verse this morning while reading one of my books in school. I believe that it has profound impact in our church culture today. I know that the lessons are, for the most part, self-evident, but I'd like to briefly share some thoughts.
In the first part of the verse you get the picture of a people who beg to be spoken to from God's Word but have little interest in allowing it to change their hearts and lives. This reminds me of several passages:
"For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander of into myths." -2 Tim. 4:3-4
"...having an appearance of godliness, but denying its power..." -2 Tim. 3:5
"...always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth." -2 Tim. 3:7
Citing Isaiah 6, Jesus says, "You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive. For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them." -Mt. 13:14-15
All of these verses are describing a people who look EXACTLY as they should on the outside but TOTALLY MISS the point of God's Word. God did not give His Word to simply help us expand our pool of knowledge. He desires that it would cut deep into our hearts (see and SAVE US from our sin and ourselves. We think of salvation only in terms of heaven and hell, but the Word of God is given for our salvation TODAY.
And before you or I begin to point a finger to identify those we think fit this catagory, let us not miss the point ourselves. Every time we hear God's Word preached, read it, or recite it from memory it should challenge us and/or encourage us. It should AFFECT US. It should make us MOVE not just feel moved.
I see this all the time in the television preacher circuit. People who hoop and hollar and enjoy all kinds of antics in the name of preaching and worship. But they live lives of lust and hatred as soon as the service ends.
Let us not be found guilty of hearing the Word and not allowing it change us.
In Christ,
Andy
I stumbled upon this verse this morning while reading one of my books in school. I believe that it has profound impact in our church culture today. I know that the lessons are, for the most part, self-evident, but I'd like to briefly share some thoughts.
In the first part of the verse you get the picture of a people who beg to be spoken to from God's Word but have little interest in allowing it to change their hearts and lives. This reminds me of several passages:
"For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander of into myths." -2 Tim. 4:3-4
"...having an appearance of godliness, but denying its power..." -2 Tim. 3:5
"...always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth." -2 Tim. 3:7
Citing Isaiah 6, Jesus says, "You will indeed hear but never understand, and you will indeed see but never perceive. For this people's heart has grown dull, and with their ears they can barely hear, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and turn, and I would heal them." -Mt. 13:14-15
All of these verses are describing a people who look EXACTLY as they should on the outside but TOTALLY MISS the point of God's Word. God did not give His Word to simply help us expand our pool of knowledge. He desires that it would cut deep into our hearts (see and SAVE US from our sin and ourselves. We think of salvation only in terms of heaven and hell, but the Word of God is given for our salvation TODAY.
And before you or I begin to point a finger to identify those we think fit this catagory, let us not miss the point ourselves. Every time we hear God's Word preached, read it, or recite it from memory it should challenge us and/or encourage us. It should AFFECT US. It should make us MOVE not just feel moved.
I see this all the time in the television preacher circuit. People who hoop and hollar and enjoy all kinds of antics in the name of preaching and worship. But they live lives of lust and hatred as soon as the service ends.
Let us not be found guilty of hearing the Word and not allowing it change us.
In Christ,
Andy
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
A Challenge to Focus Our Aim: An Optimistic View of the Events of the Past Few Days
As I sat in Church History class tonight listening to the events that led to the downfall of the Holy Roman Empire, it had SERIOUS implications for those who call themselves Christians today... especially in regards to the all the cries of "Socialism!" I've seen on Facebook.
INTRODUCTORY THOUGHTS:
IF YOU LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THIS NOTE AND SAY, "NOT FOR ME," please at least scroll down to the "IMPLICATIONS" portion of the note and read that part.
I do love the freedom that America has offered its people for the past 234 years, and I do believe that Socialism among frail human beings is absolutely a failed experiment. But I also believe that the pure capitalism we've had has truly allowed for the worst kind of selfishness and hording. I would, as a Christian, disagree with Rush Limbaugh that hording is our right (which is essentially what he says). Either model affords humanity the ability show off its broken and fallen state but from different perspectives. Please don't hear me saying that the government has the right to steal from the wealthy to give to the poor. My point is altogether different. In a nutshell, we, as believers should not be placing our hope in any government or its method of rule.
THE HISTORY:
The events that led up to the Reformation (16th Century) and the eventual fall of the Holy Roman Empire were surrounded by the concept of "Christendom." This term simply means that people saw themselves as Christian simply because they were part of the HRE. It did not mean that they were born again/regenerate or that they even personally believed what the Catholic Church was teaching. But in that era, Politics and Religion were almost indistinguishable from one another (in terms of power and policy).
The age of the Enlightenment (advances in science, more money was being made, and there was the creation of a middle class) brought a spirit of independence. People were more educated and therefore began to think for themselves. They thought, "I don't like being told what to believe (or how to govern in many cases)," and began breaking away from Rome. Over the period of 200+ years we see the creation of many Protestant denominations and eventually more and more freedom of religion (and political thought).
I could go on, but the main thing we need to get from this is that from 300 AD to 1600 AD the church ruled both religious and political life, AND people saw themselves as a Christian mostly because of their culture, not because of any particular conviction.
TODAY:
We find ourselves in a painfully similar situation (particularly in the southern states of our country) where preachers spend as much of their time trying to convince people that they are NOT Christians as they do evangelizing the lost (I am not condemning this practice. It is a common approach that I often take in my messages). This is the result of a context that has produced a type of "Christian" that is as much a cultural statement as it is a religious one. Prominent businessmen and politicians go to church, because "that's the thing to do." I wouldn't for a second point individuals out and play the part of a judge, but many understand the truth I'm trying to convey.
We live in a culture where it is perfectly acceptable (even encouraged) to post compromising pictures and comments on one's profile while at the same time having "Christian" on one's "info" tab. It's ok to post, "I really felt God this morning in church," at 12:15 PM on Sunday and, "I really hate _______ because they're such a ________" at 12:30 PM.
IMPLICATIONS: (This is the part I really want you to read)
My challenge for the true people of God is to "Focus Your Aim" on THE GOSPEL and its implications. I/We have spent many recent days complaining about the state of our country, but how many of us have truly prayed for our leaders? The Bible says in Romans 13:1 that there is no authority except from God, and except in matters that cause us to directly disobey the Bible, we are to submit to them. Does this mean that we should not protest almost a trillion dollars in more debt for our country? Of course not, but we have to ask ourselves WHY we are protesting (if we choose to do so).
Is the point of protest to WIN and beat the bad guys? Because the last time I checked WE were ALL the bad guys... some of us had simply been rescued from ourselves. And now our job is to go back into this broken world and rescue more with the power of the gospel.
My simple challenge to us all is to Focus on the Gospel. Before abortion. Before poverty. Before health care. Before employment. Before socialism or capitalism. And when we make statements of truth (because we MUST make statements of truth), let them not be as one who is hacking away at an enemy; but with wisdom and discernment, as one cuts straight to the heart of an issue with the powerful gospel of Jesus Christ.
APPLICATION:
A few more things, and I'm done. What EXACTLY do I think this looks like? Obviously it will be different for each individual; but instead of connecting the fight against universal health care to Christianity and the Republican party, connect it to the concept of financial wisdom. Instead of condemning the President, affirm things that you can find common ground with him on (or just find something positive to say) while at the same time reminding folks that Socialism IS a failed experiment. Remind them (in an apologetic manner) of where the church has failed. "Me vs. Them" is about winning with issues. "The Gospel" is about winning over hearts and souls. Issues are fleshly (temporary); souls are eternal.
Also... to my brothers and sisters of the evangelical middle class (which is my culture): Could you please at least take 10 minutes and think for a second what it might be like to exist in a culture of poverty. If you don't understand the cycle of poverty, google it. IT IS REAL folks, and all of our excuses are not going to ignore it away. The tithes of the OT were given to the Levite, the traveler (almost like a refugee), the fatherless, and the widow (see Deut. 14:29). Is that where your tithe is going? Or is it simply going to build bigger buildings for us to hide in? (note the word "simply"... I digress)
If anything, Socialism is a secular response to the church not doing its job (found in Acts 2:42-47). If we gave like that, while preaching the life-changing message of the gospel, real change could happen.
Finally, I just challenge you my brothers and sisters to spend 90% of your time reflecting on (for yourself) and preaching (for others) the Gospel and 10% opposing political problems. I never cease to be amazed at what happens when people hear that they were lost without hope, apart from God. But the same God they scorned became a man and lived a perfect life and died a perfect death to save them. He arose from the grave to give them eternal life; and God the Holy Spirit now dwells in the hearts of believers to empower them to live and please God.
Be encouraged. What's the worst that could happen? All of those who used to call themselves Christians stop pretending, the church is refined as with fire, and the true, holy, spotless bride of Christ (Eph. 5:25-27) emerges ready for her bridegroom? =)
Be encouraged!
Andy
INTRODUCTORY THOUGHTS:
IF YOU LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THIS NOTE AND SAY, "NOT FOR ME," please at least scroll down to the "IMPLICATIONS" portion of the note and read that part.
I do love the freedom that America has offered its people for the past 234 years, and I do believe that Socialism among frail human beings is absolutely a failed experiment. But I also believe that the pure capitalism we've had has truly allowed for the worst kind of selfishness and hording. I would, as a Christian, disagree with Rush Limbaugh that hording is our right (which is essentially what he says). Either model affords humanity the ability show off its broken and fallen state but from different perspectives. Please don't hear me saying that the government has the right to steal from the wealthy to give to the poor. My point is altogether different. In a nutshell, we, as believers should not be placing our hope in any government or its method of rule.
THE HISTORY:
The events that led up to the Reformation (16th Century) and the eventual fall of the Holy Roman Empire were surrounded by the concept of "Christendom." This term simply means that people saw themselves as Christian simply because they were part of the HRE. It did not mean that they were born again/regenerate or that they even personally believed what the Catholic Church was teaching. But in that era, Politics and Religion were almost indistinguishable from one another (in terms of power and policy).
The age of the Enlightenment (advances in science, more money was being made, and there was the creation of a middle class) brought a spirit of independence. People were more educated and therefore began to think for themselves. They thought, "I don't like being told what to believe (or how to govern in many cases)," and began breaking away from Rome. Over the period of 200+ years we see the creation of many Protestant denominations and eventually more and more freedom of religion (and political thought).
I could go on, but the main thing we need to get from this is that from 300 AD to 1600 AD the church ruled both religious and political life, AND people saw themselves as a Christian mostly because of their culture, not because of any particular conviction.
TODAY:
We find ourselves in a painfully similar situation (particularly in the southern states of our country) where preachers spend as much of their time trying to convince people that they are NOT Christians as they do evangelizing the lost (I am not condemning this practice. It is a common approach that I often take in my messages). This is the result of a context that has produced a type of "Christian" that is as much a cultural statement as it is a religious one. Prominent businessmen and politicians go to church, because "that's the thing to do." I wouldn't for a second point individuals out and play the part of a judge, but many understand the truth I'm trying to convey.
We live in a culture where it is perfectly acceptable (even encouraged) to post compromising pictures and comments on one's profile while at the same time having "Christian" on one's "info" tab. It's ok to post, "I really felt God this morning in church," at 12:15 PM on Sunday and, "I really hate _______ because they're such a ________" at 12:30 PM.
IMPLICATIONS: (This is the part I really want you to read)
My challenge for the true people of God is to "Focus Your Aim" on THE GOSPEL and its implications. I/We have spent many recent days complaining about the state of our country, but how many of us have truly prayed for our leaders? The Bible says in Romans 13:1 that there is no authority except from God, and except in matters that cause us to directly disobey the Bible, we are to submit to them. Does this mean that we should not protest almost a trillion dollars in more debt for our country? Of course not, but we have to ask ourselves WHY we are protesting (if we choose to do so).
Is the point of protest to WIN and beat the bad guys? Because the last time I checked WE were ALL the bad guys... some of us had simply been rescued from ourselves. And now our job is to go back into this broken world and rescue more with the power of the gospel.
My simple challenge to us all is to Focus on the Gospel. Before abortion. Before poverty. Before health care. Before employment. Before socialism or capitalism. And when we make statements of truth (because we MUST make statements of truth), let them not be as one who is hacking away at an enemy; but with wisdom and discernment, as one cuts straight to the heart of an issue with the powerful gospel of Jesus Christ.
APPLICATION:
A few more things, and I'm done. What EXACTLY do I think this looks like? Obviously it will be different for each individual; but instead of connecting the fight against universal health care to Christianity and the Republican party, connect it to the concept of financial wisdom. Instead of condemning the President, affirm things that you can find common ground with him on (or just find something positive to say) while at the same time reminding folks that Socialism IS a failed experiment. Remind them (in an apologetic manner) of where the church has failed. "Me vs. Them" is about winning with issues. "The Gospel" is about winning over hearts and souls. Issues are fleshly (temporary); souls are eternal.
Also... to my brothers and sisters of the evangelical middle class (which is my culture): Could you please at least take 10 minutes and think for a second what it might be like to exist in a culture of poverty. If you don't understand the cycle of poverty, google it. IT IS REAL folks, and all of our excuses are not going to ignore it away. The tithes of the OT were given to the Levite, the traveler (almost like a refugee), the fatherless, and the widow (see Deut. 14:29). Is that where your tithe is going? Or is it simply going to build bigger buildings for us to hide in? (note the word "simply"... I digress)
If anything, Socialism is a secular response to the church not doing its job (found in Acts 2:42-47). If we gave like that, while preaching the life-changing message of the gospel, real change could happen.
Finally, I just challenge you my brothers and sisters to spend 90% of your time reflecting on (for yourself) and preaching (for others) the Gospel and 10% opposing political problems. I never cease to be amazed at what happens when people hear that they were lost without hope, apart from God. But the same God they scorned became a man and lived a perfect life and died a perfect death to save them. He arose from the grave to give them eternal life; and God the Holy Spirit now dwells in the hearts of believers to empower them to live and please God.
Be encouraged. What's the worst that could happen? All of those who used to call themselves Christians stop pretending, the church is refined as with fire, and the true, holy, spotless bride of Christ (Eph. 5:25-27) emerges ready for her bridegroom? =)
Be encouraged!
Andy
Thursday, March 4, 2010
The (post)Modern Protestant
This semester in school has been it seems almost providentially arranged, in terms of the three classes that I happen to be taking. Church History 2, Christian Ethics, and Evangelism. At this point in the semester, all three are dealing with the phenomenon of postmodernism and the church's reaction to it. Granted, in Church History 2, we're still in the Reformation period, but there are so many similarities that tie into today's church movement(s) that I can't help draw the lines of connection.
In highly simplistic terms, the Reformation is remembered primarily as a time of PROTEST against the theology and methodology (practice) of the day.
Today, we find ourselves surrounded by "The Emerging Church" and "Emergent Theology," in which the same sort of critiques of the church are taking place. Because both desire to remain definition-less, it is hard to get a handle on what either stands for exactly, but in general the Emerging Church is a movement primarily focused on methods. They critique formalized Christianity (both traditional and contemporary) with all of its impersonal and (sometimes) hypocritical practices. Emergent Theology on the other hand is about reshaping the way we think about our system of beliefs. Really, it's about removing systematizing entirely. Depending on who you talk to, this could flesh itself out as a simple rejection of formal doctrinal statements (with no real ACTUAL rejection of orthodoxy) OR it could involve the reorganization, redefinition, or complete rejection of long-held "truths."
For the sake of time and space, I just want to make two observations related to parallels in these modern movements and the Reformation. One positive and one negative. I'm sure there will be plenty of time in the future to discuss more.
1. Positive - from a positive stand-point, I can completely relate to BOTH trains of thought (at least in part). I remember sitting in the office with Joe Steele (my youth pastor in High School) on many occasions and saying things like, "This PROGRAM just isn't working... we need to scrap it and do something that will reach people." Upon which Joe always replied, "Are you just going to close down the church and forget all that we ARE doing right?" I see the wisdom in his statement, but that still doesn't change the fact that we have good reason for questioning the institutional church and many of it's archaic methods.
I'm not talking about music here. These modern thinkers would place organ-led hymns and rock-and-roll praise music in the same category... it's program... they want relationship and "real-life" change.
The archaic methods I'm referring to are the "come-see" approach to evangelism (as if people had to be in a church building to be reborn in Christ) and the institutionalized form of education. For me, this does not mean a scrapping of formality entirely, but simply a recognition that people learn by interaction and by "taking ownership" of what they believe. The lecture format (including the sermon) can not be the ONLY method we use. If it is, we will lose people in a post-modern culture.
The way this relates to the Protestant Reformation is in how so much of what started this movement was directly related to methods. Things like indulgences (or the selling of grace) and the manipulation of the priesthood's role were outward grievances that drove the Reformers to search the Scriptures for Biblical discrepancies.
---
2. Negative - Following the train of thought in that last statement, my critique of these two movements is that while the Reformation, for most, was a return to the Scriptures as the authority for faith and practice, the ECM and Emergent theology seem to want to place culture as the authority for making critical decisions. For example: When Luther, Zwingli, or Calvin wanted to critique a practice of the current Roman Catholic church, they stated their grievance followed by a Scriptural foundation for that grievance. The Reformation was a refining process with the Bible as the FIRE.
On the other hand, the ECM and Emergent theology both seem to allow culture to be the refining fire, which we all know changes with the latest top-40 song or reality TV show.
Please don't hear me wrong. I believe strongly in the contextualization of the gospel in a given culture (we are ALL missionaries in our town). It's ridiculous to act as if the south is still in the 1950s in our services... not just because the world laughs at us (they're going to do this from time to time anyway) but because we're not speaking their language. It's as if I went to China and expected everyone to learn English, my hymnbook, and my church's operating procedure before I could share the gospel with them.
But the critique is found in the fact that while the postmodern culture holds to no absolute truth, we must part ways in standing on the truth of God's Word. I'm not saying that we have to formulate our statements of faith in the same ways (or to the same degrees) that we have in the past, but, make no mistake, there MUST be statements of faith. And while our methods ABSOLUTELY MUST change (and fast), the gospel (and the core beliefs surrounding it) can not.
As a final note: One of my biggest problems with both the Emerging Church and Emergent theology is that it's mostly about NEGATIVE statements. God has really been convicting me lately about how all of our negative statements about the current condition of the church must be followed up with helpful and constructive positive statements that drive change.
I hope that this growing conviction begins to find its way into my writing. We, who are desiring change in Christ's church, must stop whining about what we DON'T LIKE in the traditional church, and start producing options for those who genuinely want to change. It is to this end that I hope to write in the future.
In Christ,
Andy Duke
In highly simplistic terms, the Reformation is remembered primarily as a time of PROTEST against the theology and methodology (practice) of the day.
Today, we find ourselves surrounded by "The Emerging Church" and "Emergent Theology," in which the same sort of critiques of the church are taking place. Because both desire to remain definition-less, it is hard to get a handle on what either stands for exactly, but in general the Emerging Church is a movement primarily focused on methods. They critique formalized Christianity (both traditional and contemporary) with all of its impersonal and (sometimes) hypocritical practices. Emergent Theology on the other hand is about reshaping the way we think about our system of beliefs. Really, it's about removing systematizing entirely. Depending on who you talk to, this could flesh itself out as a simple rejection of formal doctrinal statements (with no real ACTUAL rejection of orthodoxy) OR it could involve the reorganization, redefinition, or complete rejection of long-held "truths."
For the sake of time and space, I just want to make two observations related to parallels in these modern movements and the Reformation. One positive and one negative. I'm sure there will be plenty of time in the future to discuss more.
1. Positive - from a positive stand-point, I can completely relate to BOTH trains of thought (at least in part). I remember sitting in the office with Joe Steele (my youth pastor in High School) on many occasions and saying things like, "This PROGRAM just isn't working... we need to scrap it and do something that will reach people." Upon which Joe always replied, "Are you just going to close down the church and forget all that we ARE doing right?" I see the wisdom in his statement, but that still doesn't change the fact that we have good reason for questioning the institutional church and many of it's archaic methods.
I'm not talking about music here. These modern thinkers would place organ-led hymns and rock-and-roll praise music in the same category... it's program... they want relationship and "real-life" change.
The archaic methods I'm referring to are the "come-see" approach to evangelism (as if people had to be in a church building to be reborn in Christ) and the institutionalized form of education. For me, this does not mean a scrapping of formality entirely, but simply a recognition that people learn by interaction and by "taking ownership" of what they believe. The lecture format (including the sermon) can not be the ONLY method we use. If it is, we will lose people in a post-modern culture.
The way this relates to the Protestant Reformation is in how so much of what started this movement was directly related to methods. Things like indulgences (or the selling of grace) and the manipulation of the priesthood's role were outward grievances that drove the Reformers to search the Scriptures for Biblical discrepancies.
---
2. Negative - Following the train of thought in that last statement, my critique of these two movements is that while the Reformation, for most, was a return to the Scriptures as the authority for faith and practice, the ECM and Emergent theology seem to want to place culture as the authority for making critical decisions. For example: When Luther, Zwingli, or Calvin wanted to critique a practice of the current Roman Catholic church, they stated their grievance followed by a Scriptural foundation for that grievance. The Reformation was a refining process with the Bible as the FIRE.
On the other hand, the ECM and Emergent theology both seem to allow culture to be the refining fire, which we all know changes with the latest top-40 song or reality TV show.
Please don't hear me wrong. I believe strongly in the contextualization of the gospel in a given culture (we are ALL missionaries in our town). It's ridiculous to act as if the south is still in the 1950s in our services... not just because the world laughs at us (they're going to do this from time to time anyway) but because we're not speaking their language. It's as if I went to China and expected everyone to learn English, my hymnbook, and my church's operating procedure before I could share the gospel with them.
But the critique is found in the fact that while the postmodern culture holds to no absolute truth, we must part ways in standing on the truth of God's Word. I'm not saying that we have to formulate our statements of faith in the same ways (or to the same degrees) that we have in the past, but, make no mistake, there MUST be statements of faith. And while our methods ABSOLUTELY MUST change (and fast), the gospel (and the core beliefs surrounding it) can not.
As a final note: One of my biggest problems with both the Emerging Church and Emergent theology is that it's mostly about NEGATIVE statements. God has really been convicting me lately about how all of our negative statements about the current condition of the church must be followed up with helpful and constructive positive statements that drive change.
I hope that this growing conviction begins to find its way into my writing. We, who are desiring change in Christ's church, must stop whining about what we DON'T LIKE in the traditional church, and start producing options for those who genuinely want to change. It is to this end that I hope to write in the future.
In Christ,
Andy Duke
Monday, February 22, 2010
The Gospel - Assumed or Explicit?
I know that I can easily be accused of being negative about "the church" (universal) from time to time. Sometimes this comes from a selfish, fleshly desire that I see replicated in leaders around me to be the "next big thing" in the ministry revolution. But a great deal of my frustration has been centered in the reality that SO MANY who spend their lives in our churches will, quite possibly, spend an eternity in hell because their religion will NEVER be enough to save them.
And before any of us pick up the pitchforks and megaphones: If you were raised in below the mason-dixon line in an evangelical church, I'm talking about you (and about me). While I do believe that I have understood and embraced justification by faith alone, I find myself in a daily struggle to justify myself with my works. It's hogwash, and it's heretical. Most of all... it's scary.
It's terrifying to me that so many are blinded by their southern religion.
My intent with this post is not to write another long treatise but rather to encourage you to watch a presentation by a man I've recently begun following named Matt Chandler. He gave this message at the Southeastern 20/20 conference (via recording). I believe Matt to be a godly man who is completely immersed in the Bible.
PLEASE take time to watch this. It could seriously change you and your church's life.
I think it's about 27 minutes long.
http://apps.sebts.edu/multimedia/?p=585
In Christ,
Andy
And before any of us pick up the pitchforks and megaphones: If you were raised in below the mason-dixon line in an evangelical church, I'm talking about you (and about me). While I do believe that I have understood and embraced justification by faith alone, I find myself in a daily struggle to justify myself with my works. It's hogwash, and it's heretical. Most of all... it's scary.
It's terrifying to me that so many are blinded by their southern religion.
My intent with this post is not to write another long treatise but rather to encourage you to watch a presentation by a man I've recently begun following named Matt Chandler. He gave this message at the Southeastern 20/20 conference (via recording). I believe Matt to be a godly man who is completely immersed in the Bible.
PLEASE take time to watch this. It could seriously change you and your church's life.
I think it's about 27 minutes long.
http://apps.sebts.edu/multimedia/?p=585
In Christ,
Andy
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Personal Holiness
No one can criticize my generation for lack of passion. So many of us see the glory of God as the greatest thing to be exalted, and we write a plethora of songs that would fill many new hymnbooks. We see the challenge of over 6000 unreached people groups left in our world, and we think "this is possible in my lifetime. We CAN reach the rest of the unreached." Many of us stand upon God's Word as the ONLY source of absolute truth and do not waver in our convictions about its commands. Many of us proclaim the gospel with integrity and do not apologize for its "foolishness" nor for it being a "stumbling block" (see 1 Cor 1-2).
These things are also my passion. They are also my motivation and my aim. But, we seem to lack in one issue of great importance. I've noticed this throughout my life, but it's always been hard to identify. This has been difficult primarily because many of my heroes, most of the people that I (even still) consider godly men have shown some inconsistency in this area. I, myself, seem to fluctuate violently at times with this as well.
The issue is that of personal holiness.
This blog is not written to identify specific sins that I see as common among God's people these days. The sins are obvious, not only to ourselves, but also to everyone around us.
My main goal in writing this entry is to simply encourage those who identify with what I am saying to allow yourself to be pressed and challenged by the Holy Spirit more each day to truly look like Christ.
Romans 8 says that is the will of God that we be conformed to Christ's image, yay, it is even a predestined reality for those of us who are His. But it seems that we have come to view this only as an eternal reality, as if it were something we could not grasp even now if we so desired.
Let us put away the selfish and foolish things of this world to obtain a higher calling.
The reason many of us have rejected practical, personal holiness is because we despise the "pharisaism" that so many in our faith have exhibited in recent and past days. Many of these so-called "holy men" seem only to have hurt the witness of the the church and the cause of the gospel. And so, in historical Christian fashion, we throw the baby out with the bath water. We try to live as close to the world as possible, thinking that this will help our effectiveness.
I do not come from the camp that says, "Don't dress like the world (within reason of course) or listen to secular music or watch movies or ____________ (fill in your vice)." These things have little to do with holiness in and of themselves. Holiness is truly an attitude of the heart. It is a kin to humility.
On a practical level: There are days when I truly can not listen to anything secular on the radio. This usually happens when I haven't spent necessary time with God OR when He is teaching me something so profound that my heart needs silence. In this case, music as a whole is absent.
Please don't hear me wrong, but I believe that holiness is one of the most exact and disciplined areas of the Christian life (at the "between-you-and-God" level) and one of the most relative elements of our Christian life (at the practical/application level). To judge another believer's level of personal holiness is almost always a grave error, but it seems that we can not judge our own enough.
"Be Holy as I am Holy" (Mt. 7).
In Christ,
Andy
These things are also my passion. They are also my motivation and my aim. But, we seem to lack in one issue of great importance. I've noticed this throughout my life, but it's always been hard to identify. This has been difficult primarily because many of my heroes, most of the people that I (even still) consider godly men have shown some inconsistency in this area. I, myself, seem to fluctuate violently at times with this as well.
The issue is that of personal holiness.
This blog is not written to identify specific sins that I see as common among God's people these days. The sins are obvious, not only to ourselves, but also to everyone around us.
My main goal in writing this entry is to simply encourage those who identify with what I am saying to allow yourself to be pressed and challenged by the Holy Spirit more each day to truly look like Christ.
Romans 8 says that is the will of God that we be conformed to Christ's image, yay, it is even a predestined reality for those of us who are His. But it seems that we have come to view this only as an eternal reality, as if it were something we could not grasp even now if we so desired.
Let us put away the selfish and foolish things of this world to obtain a higher calling.
The reason many of us have rejected practical, personal holiness is because we despise the "pharisaism" that so many in our faith have exhibited in recent and past days. Many of these so-called "holy men" seem only to have hurt the witness of the the church and the cause of the gospel. And so, in historical Christian fashion, we throw the baby out with the bath water. We try to live as close to the world as possible, thinking that this will help our effectiveness.
I do not come from the camp that says, "Don't dress like the world (within reason of course) or listen to secular music or watch movies or ____________ (fill in your vice)." These things have little to do with holiness in and of themselves. Holiness is truly an attitude of the heart. It is a kin to humility.
On a practical level: There are days when I truly can not listen to anything secular on the radio. This usually happens when I haven't spent necessary time with God OR when He is teaching me something so profound that my heart needs silence. In this case, music as a whole is absent.
Please don't hear me wrong, but I believe that holiness is one of the most exact and disciplined areas of the Christian life (at the "between-you-and-God" level) and one of the most relative elements of our Christian life (at the practical/application level). To judge another believer's level of personal holiness is almost always a grave error, but it seems that we can not judge our own enough.
"Be Holy as I am Holy" (Mt. 7).
In Christ,
Andy
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
The Value in Theological Determinism
Before I hit the bed, I think I should at least update everyone on my thoughts and what I'm learning this week.
It is an HONEST struggle of mine that many of my heroes of the faith (both current and historical) fall into a theological camp or system that I can't seem to align myself with. I understand many of the arguments of this position and even hold to many of it's basic tenents, but I simply can not buy into all of it's nuances.
I want to avoid using the terminology that so many in the past have used to (really) "box in" view points in a radical, absolutists sort of way. So, instead of saying Calvinism vs. Arminianism or Reformed vs. Everything else, I'd like to use the term Theological Determinism.
"Determinism" (for our purposes) is the view that everything is predestined or for-ordained, and "Theological" simply defines who determined it... namely God.
I know that there may be those who make distinctions between Calvinism, Reformed Theology, and Theological Determinism, but just step back for a second and accept, in the grand scheme of things, that I am using these terms as VIRTUALLY Synonymous.
I choose to use "Theological Determinism" because the terms "Calvinism" and "Reformed" have so much baggage for the common church-member (whether good or bad).
And so... to the issue at hand.
My struggle, as of late, with this fact that so many of those that I look to for spiritual direction and guidance seem to think so differently on certain theological viewpoints has lead me explore WHY certain doctrinal nuances are so important to them.
I want to do my best to explain WHY those who differ (whether a lot or a little) from the Theological Determinst should at least respect their view, for in their view are nuggets of particularly life-changing truth that can be freeing and empowering for the Christian Life (and Christian Thought Life).
I will intentionally overstate some points so as to drive home (what I believe is) the good that can be gained from their particular viewpoint. This does not mean that I prescribe to THE WAY that they end up formulating their system of beliefs.
1. Man is completely and utterly dead without Christ. Not mostly dead (think Princess Bride :), but completely dead. It would do us all some good contemplate and meditate on just how lost lostness really is.
2. We've somehow gotten up the idea that because God created us "knowing" that we would sin, He somehow OWES US salvation in order to be fair. God does not owe us anything. Perhaps everyone else has just always believed this, but it has been revolutionary to me to think that there was somehow, potentially a way that we would NOT be saved. We would die apart from grace and suffer punishment for all eternity. And... most importantly... this is how it SHOULD have gone. God would have been most justified in allowing this "natural" chain of events to occur. But it is in His love and grace that He chose to save us.
3. It is not by ANYTHING we have done that God chose to save us. Though I do hold to the view that God saves those whom He knows will ultimtely choose Him (the idea of foreknowledge-based predestination)... I do not believe that this says anything about US and it says everything about Him. His foreknowledge of those who would choose Him did not FORCE Him to bring salvation to them. He still chose to bring it. He still chose to draw those whom He would. Their acceptance of grace is and was still subject to the drawing of the Holy Spirit.
4. God's will WILL win out the day. We are predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:28). I, at this juncture, personally believe in the predestination of circumstances, not souls... though, in a sense, that's an argument in symantics.
I ABSOLUTELY believe in the free will, free choice of man when it comes to salvation and every other thing in life which CAN be chosen (ie... place of birth, parents, etc. CAN'T be chosen by you). Who knows exactly how this works, but it seems to me that the spirit of man is quickened to the point of being able to make a FREE WILL choice to accept or reject the work of Christ.
5. I reject, in it's entirety, the doctrine of Limited Atonement. The main reason I reject this is because it is a logical or phylisophical argument and not a Biblical one. To say that God has a chosen people and therefore Jesus only died for those people is logical but misunderstands the idea of Atonement in the Scriptures. This point does not follow suit with my overall purpose in this entry, but I thought it necessary to continue with the line of typical thought among theological determinists.
6. It is comforting to know that while I do have a choice in the matter of my salvation, it's inception, growth, and completion are entirely in the hands of God. Be careful. Personal holiness is most certainly the duty of man, but even this must be empowered by the Holy Spirit in order to be acccomplished. Without God the Holy Spirit, personal holiness is simply self-righteousness.
All of this is to say that I am beginning to appreciate why many theological determinists say things the way they say them. I am not yet ready, nor do I think I'll ever be ready, to jump head-long into becoming a ___________ (fill in the blank with your label), but I KNOW there is something to be learned from these great men and women of faith and their theological positions.
In Christ,
Andy
It is an HONEST struggle of mine that many of my heroes of the faith (both current and historical) fall into a theological camp or system that I can't seem to align myself with. I understand many of the arguments of this position and even hold to many of it's basic tenents, but I simply can not buy into all of it's nuances.
I want to avoid using the terminology that so many in the past have used to (really) "box in" view points in a radical, absolutists sort of way. So, instead of saying Calvinism vs. Arminianism or Reformed vs. Everything else, I'd like to use the term Theological Determinism.
"Determinism" (for our purposes) is the view that everything is predestined or for-ordained, and "Theological" simply defines who determined it... namely God.
I know that there may be those who make distinctions between Calvinism, Reformed Theology, and Theological Determinism, but just step back for a second and accept, in the grand scheme of things, that I am using these terms as VIRTUALLY Synonymous.
I choose to use "Theological Determinism" because the terms "Calvinism" and "Reformed" have so much baggage for the common church-member (whether good or bad).
And so... to the issue at hand.
My struggle, as of late, with this fact that so many of those that I look to for spiritual direction and guidance seem to think so differently on certain theological viewpoints has lead me explore WHY certain doctrinal nuances are so important to them.
I want to do my best to explain WHY those who differ (whether a lot or a little) from the Theological Determinst should at least respect their view, for in their view are nuggets of particularly life-changing truth that can be freeing and empowering for the Christian Life (and Christian Thought Life).
I will intentionally overstate some points so as to drive home (what I believe is) the good that can be gained from their particular viewpoint. This does not mean that I prescribe to THE WAY that they end up formulating their system of beliefs.
1. Man is completely and utterly dead without Christ. Not mostly dead (think Princess Bride :), but completely dead. It would do us all some good contemplate and meditate on just how lost lostness really is.
2. We've somehow gotten up the idea that because God created us "knowing" that we would sin, He somehow OWES US salvation in order to be fair. God does not owe us anything. Perhaps everyone else has just always believed this, but it has been revolutionary to me to think that there was somehow, potentially a way that we would NOT be saved. We would die apart from grace and suffer punishment for all eternity. And... most importantly... this is how it SHOULD have gone. God would have been most justified in allowing this "natural" chain of events to occur. But it is in His love and grace that He chose to save us.
3. It is not by ANYTHING we have done that God chose to save us. Though I do hold to the view that God saves those whom He knows will ultimtely choose Him (the idea of foreknowledge-based predestination)... I do not believe that this says anything about US and it says everything about Him. His foreknowledge of those who would choose Him did not FORCE Him to bring salvation to them. He still chose to bring it. He still chose to draw those whom He would. Their acceptance of grace is and was still subject to the drawing of the Holy Spirit.
4. God's will WILL win out the day. We are predestined to be conformed to the image of Christ (Romans 8:28). I, at this juncture, personally believe in the predestination of circumstances, not souls... though, in a sense, that's an argument in symantics.
I ABSOLUTELY believe in the free will, free choice of man when it comes to salvation and every other thing in life which CAN be chosen (ie... place of birth, parents, etc. CAN'T be chosen by you). Who knows exactly how this works, but it seems to me that the spirit of man is quickened to the point of being able to make a FREE WILL choice to accept or reject the work of Christ.
5. I reject, in it's entirety, the doctrine of Limited Atonement. The main reason I reject this is because it is a logical or phylisophical argument and not a Biblical one. To say that God has a chosen people and therefore Jesus only died for those people is logical but misunderstands the idea of Atonement in the Scriptures. This point does not follow suit with my overall purpose in this entry, but I thought it necessary to continue with the line of typical thought among theological determinists.
6. It is comforting to know that while I do have a choice in the matter of my salvation, it's inception, growth, and completion are entirely in the hands of God. Be careful. Personal holiness is most certainly the duty of man, but even this must be empowered by the Holy Spirit in order to be acccomplished. Without God the Holy Spirit, personal holiness is simply self-righteousness.
All of this is to say that I am beginning to appreciate why many theological determinists say things the way they say them. I am not yet ready, nor do I think I'll ever be ready, to jump head-long into becoming a ___________ (fill in the blank with your label), but I KNOW there is something to be learned from these great men and women of faith and their theological positions.
In Christ,
Andy
Monday, February 15, 2010
Is the Law abolished? (please respond)
Are Matthew 5:17 and Ephesians 2:15 in contradiction with each other?
Note: you'll need to read Matthew 5:17-20 and Ephesians chapter 2 (at a minimum) to get an understanding of what's going on.
What do you think?
Note: you'll need to read Matthew 5:17-20 and Ephesians chapter 2 (at a minimum) to get an understanding of what's going on.
What do you think?
Works or Grace? (please respond)
Are Romans 4:4-5/Ephesians 2:8-9 and James 2:18, 26 in contradiction with each other?
Note: Again, it is important to read the context (surrounding verses and/or chapters) to get a fuller understanding of what each writer is saying.
What do you think?
Note: Again, it is important to read the context (surrounding verses and/or chapters) to get a fuller understanding of what each writer is saying.
What do you think?
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
“He must increase, I must decrease.”
This week my thoughts have turned toward the idea of greatness. What is greatness? How do we attain it? How are its degrees measured? So, it was encouraging today to attend chapel and hear a sermon entitled “Living a Great Life.” I will include some of the preacher’s thoughts and add some of my own for this entry.
I think it would be pertinent for us to all be honest and admit that much of what “greatness” means today in the church is simply a baptized version of the world’s definition. We talk about submission to the Lordship of Jesus, about humility, about His kingdom being “upside-down” (a common term at my previous ministry), but do we actually live in such a way as to exalt Christ and belittle (in one sense of the word) ourselves.
There is no shortage of passages that teach us this truth, but perhaps the most pointed is in Matthew chapter 20. Verse 25 starts with:
You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. It shall not be so with you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many (ESV).
The paradox of the upside-down kingdom is a common thread throughout the entire New Testament (and arguably the Old as well). But what does this look like for us, and why is it so difficult for us to follow?
It seems that the trend today, among pastors, speakers, and the like, is to desire to become the next Mark Driscoll, Andy Stanley, Billy Graham, or pick your celebrity. I see this among my fellow brothers in Christ (especially here at seminary), and I see it myself almost daily.
Imitation of mature leaders is a biblical concept. Paul affirms this in 1 Thess. 1:6 as well as other places. And while many of the men that we aspire to imitate are worthy of it, it seems that our desire is less to follow their example in discipline, humility, and Christ-like attitude and actions, and more to follow in their fame and success.
This is simply sinful. Many of the great men of God in the past and present have sought no glory from men but have received such as a result of the influence God has given them. I often hear many of my modern-day heroes say, “I hate this notoriety because it only feeds my flesh.” It reminds me of Paul’s battle with the thorn in his flesh in 2 Cor. 12. Because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations he had received, God allowed this thorn (whatever it was) to remain ever before Paul as a device causing humility.
I find it interesting that Paul’s humility was caused not by an act of the Spirit but by the flesh. God allowed a physical or emotional (possibly psychological) weakness to be daily present in the apostle’s life so as to keep him returning to God in brokenness.
And while I do not believe that this passage gives us excuse to allow sin to remain in our life (in fact the thorn in the flesh was not even associated with sin specifically), I do think it is telling that one of the greatest of apostles was not allowed to overcome some weakness in order to teach him to fully embrace the grace of God and to return all glory to the Father through the Son.
From a practical standpoint, I think we ministers of the gospel (which is all of us to one degree or another), must actually SEEK the positions of servitude. Some might argue that Acts 6 says otherwise, but I would remind them that all of the apostles died martyrs deaths except for John. There were no book tours or 5-star suites awaiting the apostles at any part of their journey.
Somehow we must figure out a way to ACTUALLY live for the glory of God. I hear speakers say this all the time, but every external thing they do seems to remind people of them. I know that there are so many greatly gifted men and women out there that NEED to be writing books, teaching classes, preaching to the masses, and singing songs for the glory of God, but we as a church have got to learn how to exalt their message (the gospel) and the source of their message (God) above the servant messenger.
To my fellow ministers who are truly nowhere on the map in terms of “greatness” as defined by the world, REJOICE. Find joy in the one or two students to whom you are a hero, and POINT THEM to the one who will never leave them or disappoint them (because I promise you, you will, eventually). Do not search for “the next big thing” or the next “career move” in ministry as if we had our own corporate church ladders to climb. And don’t justify yourself in these meaningless pursuits.
If God is to exalt you, let Him. But do not seek to exalt yourself. Daily, remember to humble yourself in the sight of the Lord” (James 4:10). Seek the lowly positions. Seek to hide your own glory, and seek to reflect His. Be genuine. Do this as an act of the heart and not simply in false, outward humility.
This is all a painful challenge and reminder to myself. A verse/statement that is continually upon my heart lately is in John 3, when John the Baptist is asked about his relationship to Jesus. He simply states in verses 29 and 30: “Therefore this joy of mine is complete. He must increase, but I must decrease.”
John found complete joy in becoming small (even though he was the Billy Graham of his day at that time) as Jesus, the one to whom all glory is due, came on the scene.
Let us actively seek to decrease, that Christ may increase, together.
In Christ,
Andy
I think it would be pertinent for us to all be honest and admit that much of what “greatness” means today in the church is simply a baptized version of the world’s definition. We talk about submission to the Lordship of Jesus, about humility, about His kingdom being “upside-down” (a common term at my previous ministry), but do we actually live in such a way as to exalt Christ and belittle (in one sense of the word) ourselves.
There is no shortage of passages that teach us this truth, but perhaps the most pointed is in Matthew chapter 20. Verse 25 starts with:
You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. It shall not be so with you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be your slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many (ESV).
The paradox of the upside-down kingdom is a common thread throughout the entire New Testament (and arguably the Old as well). But what does this look like for us, and why is it so difficult for us to follow?
It seems that the trend today, among pastors, speakers, and the like, is to desire to become the next Mark Driscoll, Andy Stanley, Billy Graham, or pick your celebrity. I see this among my fellow brothers in Christ (especially here at seminary), and I see it myself almost daily.
Imitation of mature leaders is a biblical concept. Paul affirms this in 1 Thess. 1:6 as well as other places. And while many of the men that we aspire to imitate are worthy of it, it seems that our desire is less to follow their example in discipline, humility, and Christ-like attitude and actions, and more to follow in their fame and success.
This is simply sinful. Many of the great men of God in the past and present have sought no glory from men but have received such as a result of the influence God has given them. I often hear many of my modern-day heroes say, “I hate this notoriety because it only feeds my flesh.” It reminds me of Paul’s battle with the thorn in his flesh in 2 Cor. 12. Because of the surpassing greatness of the revelations he had received, God allowed this thorn (whatever it was) to remain ever before Paul as a device causing humility.
I find it interesting that Paul’s humility was caused not by an act of the Spirit but by the flesh. God allowed a physical or emotional (possibly psychological) weakness to be daily present in the apostle’s life so as to keep him returning to God in brokenness.
And while I do not believe that this passage gives us excuse to allow sin to remain in our life (in fact the thorn in the flesh was not even associated with sin specifically), I do think it is telling that one of the greatest of apostles was not allowed to overcome some weakness in order to teach him to fully embrace the grace of God and to return all glory to the Father through the Son.
From a practical standpoint, I think we ministers of the gospel (which is all of us to one degree or another), must actually SEEK the positions of servitude. Some might argue that Acts 6 says otherwise, but I would remind them that all of the apostles died martyrs deaths except for John. There were no book tours or 5-star suites awaiting the apostles at any part of their journey.
Somehow we must figure out a way to ACTUALLY live for the glory of God. I hear speakers say this all the time, but every external thing they do seems to remind people of them. I know that there are so many greatly gifted men and women out there that NEED to be writing books, teaching classes, preaching to the masses, and singing songs for the glory of God, but we as a church have got to learn how to exalt their message (the gospel) and the source of their message (God) above the servant messenger.
To my fellow ministers who are truly nowhere on the map in terms of “greatness” as defined by the world, REJOICE. Find joy in the one or two students to whom you are a hero, and POINT THEM to the one who will never leave them or disappoint them (because I promise you, you will, eventually). Do not search for “the next big thing” or the next “career move” in ministry as if we had our own corporate church ladders to climb. And don’t justify yourself in these meaningless pursuits.
If God is to exalt you, let Him. But do not seek to exalt yourself. Daily, remember to humble yourself in the sight of the Lord” (James 4:10). Seek the lowly positions. Seek to hide your own glory, and seek to reflect His. Be genuine. Do this as an act of the heart and not simply in false, outward humility.
This is all a painful challenge and reminder to myself. A verse/statement that is continually upon my heart lately is in John 3, when John the Baptist is asked about his relationship to Jesus. He simply states in verses 29 and 30: “Therefore this joy of mine is complete. He must increase, but I must decrease.”
John found complete joy in becoming small (even though he was the Billy Graham of his day at that time) as Jesus, the one to whom all glory is due, came on the scene.
Let us actively seek to decrease, that Christ may increase, together.
In Christ,
Andy
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Repentance in Evangelism
If I had to pack my stuff back up (God forbid!) and leave school right now, the things that God has taught me in the past 7 days have already made such a profound impact that my life and ministry would and MUST look so very different.
One of the beautiful things about the redemption of God is that those who are learning from you and with you can sometimes get as much out of your errors as they can your successes. This is not to say that we should intentionally shirk responsibility in hopes that this might happen, but redeeming our mess ups is a beautiful safety net by which God is always glorifying himself and spreading the gospel around the world.
I mention all of that as a preface to repentance. Over the past 7 days that Lord has reminded me time and time again of how I have neglected a primary responsibility as a disciple of Jesus over my years of ministry. I have not made it a priority to personally be sharing the gospel with lost people on a regular basis. The key word is "personally." Who am I praying for? Who am I having intentional conversations with? Who am I leading to (or at least toward) Jesus RIGHT NOW?
The most convicting reality of all is that the sheep look like the shepherd. And I know this is true, especially in the ministry that I have recently left. I have a wonderful group of students who KNOW what the gospel is. They know the Bigger Story of redemption that is centered on Jesus Christ. They know the disciplines of the Christian life, and they know some practical ways to navigate life in a Christ-like manner. But, because I have not set the example obedience to personally evangelize those around me, they have followed suit for the most part.
But, be sure of one thing. This will change in me. And If hope that if these statements are true of you, it will change in you as well. This will change... not because I have some new strategy or passion. It's not because I've uncovered some new truth. It is because I am thoroughly convinced that the Holy Spirit of God will no longer allow me to preach to the masses without preaching to individuals. He will make my heart a mess of unrest if this lack of integrity continues any longer.
And so, I pray for you that you will FIND LOST PEOPLE and live the gospel and share the gospel. And I ask you to pray for me that I will find such opportunities as well.
In the past, I've always seen it like this: It's my job to be faithful in the disciplines of the Christian life, and God will bring people along my way that I can share the gospel with. Almost like Augustine's old adage... "Preach the gospel, and when necessary, use words." No offense, but this is ridiculous. The gospel can only be preached with words. As I heard it said today in a sermon: "Asking someone to share the gospel without words is like asking someone to share their phone number without digits." Proof of the gospel is conveyed in a person's life, but the gospel itself is given with words.
And we need to share it!
In Christ,
Andy
One of the beautiful things about the redemption of God is that those who are learning from you and with you can sometimes get as much out of your errors as they can your successes. This is not to say that we should intentionally shirk responsibility in hopes that this might happen, but redeeming our mess ups is a beautiful safety net by which God is always glorifying himself and spreading the gospel around the world.
I mention all of that as a preface to repentance. Over the past 7 days that Lord has reminded me time and time again of how I have neglected a primary responsibility as a disciple of Jesus over my years of ministry. I have not made it a priority to personally be sharing the gospel with lost people on a regular basis. The key word is "personally." Who am I praying for? Who am I having intentional conversations with? Who am I leading to (or at least toward) Jesus RIGHT NOW?
The most convicting reality of all is that the sheep look like the shepherd. And I know this is true, especially in the ministry that I have recently left. I have a wonderful group of students who KNOW what the gospel is. They know the Bigger Story of redemption that is centered on Jesus Christ. They know the disciplines of the Christian life, and they know some practical ways to navigate life in a Christ-like manner. But, because I have not set the example obedience to personally evangelize those around me, they have followed suit for the most part.
But, be sure of one thing. This will change in me. And If hope that if these statements are true of you, it will change in you as well. This will change... not because I have some new strategy or passion. It's not because I've uncovered some new truth. It is because I am thoroughly convinced that the Holy Spirit of God will no longer allow me to preach to the masses without preaching to individuals. He will make my heart a mess of unrest if this lack of integrity continues any longer.
And so, I pray for you that you will FIND LOST PEOPLE and live the gospel and share the gospel. And I ask you to pray for me that I will find such opportunities as well.
In the past, I've always seen it like this: It's my job to be faithful in the disciplines of the Christian life, and God will bring people along my way that I can share the gospel with. Almost like Augustine's old adage... "Preach the gospel, and when necessary, use words." No offense, but this is ridiculous. The gospel can only be preached with words. As I heard it said today in a sermon: "Asking someone to share the gospel without words is like asking someone to share their phone number without digits." Proof of the gospel is conveyed in a person's life, but the gospel itself is given with words.
And we need to share it!
In Christ,
Andy
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Live NOW
Introduction:
There was so much that I wanted to write in my last entry that I simply could not at the time. I wanted to tell you all of the amazing work that God was doing in my heart and in my life. I wanted to share with you the joy of experiencing movement toward the God-centered next thing in my life, and I wanted to share with you the pain of leaving the God-centered previous thing in my life.
During the transition process of the past two weeks I've had many come to me and say, "You're moving on to BIGGER and BETTER things." And while, from a human perspective there may be some truth to this, from a God-centered perspective this movement is only into DIFFERENT things, not bigger or better.
There is nothing BIGGER than the local church, and there is nothing BETTER than that church living out the gospel week in and week out. It is MY LOSS to leave Northlake Baptist Church after almost 4 years of service to you and the Kingdom. I hope you have learned from me, and I know that I have learned from you.
Live NOW:
Tonight I wanted to share a thought that I have often shared with my students at NSM.
It is so easy for us to view movement in this life in terms of "bigger" and "better." It is so easy to get lost in the excitement of moments like these. One week ago I was spending my final hours as the Student Pastor at NBC. One week before that I was weeping with kids that have become a real part of who I am. One week before that I officially resigned my position, and two days before that God began the two sleepless nights that would (lovingly) FORCE me to finally obey His call for me to move on.
I've always struggled with defining success in what's happening NEXT. In middle school I looked to High school. In ninth grade I looked to getting a driver's license. At sixteen I looked to graduation. At graduation I looked to college. In college I looked to marriage. In marriage I looked to having children. And so on and so forth.
And while God has certainly ordained some of this excitement and anticipation as part of our motivation to grow and learn and be changed by Him, we must be careful to not forget to Live NOW. I've often told my students that "God will not take you to a new lesson or level until you've learned the one He has for you now."
For me, there were some very specific lessons that I had to learn before moving to this next stage. Most of them are/were very personal, but one that I can share is in relation to my discipline in study.
Almost 4 months before God ultimately called me to "pack up your things and go to the place I will tell you," He began to impress upon my heart that I had gotten LAZY in my studies. I have almost always stayed disciplined in my study of the Bible itself, but I have used this as an excuse to exclude the study of other disciplines or material. I always justified it by saying, "The Bible is sufficient for all that I need to know." And while this may sound good on paper, it's a cop-out for a true leader and student. God has graciously given insight to many individuals... insight that I could not attain on my own. These precious "nuggets" are being shared with us through the medium of writers and preachers and apologists, and we should listen and soak it all in.
And so, as God has challenged me to step up my studies over the past 4 months, He was, in ways that only He can do, preparing me for the SYLLABUS SHOCK that I have gotten the past week at Southeastern.
Now I am excited by the challenge. I am motivated to be the BEST that I can be at what I do because that's what the Kingdom needs. God needs/wants us at our best. Knowing our best. Thinking our best. And DOING our best.
So, I encourage us all to Live NOW the best that you can for the glory of God and the gospel to the world. It's great to dream of the future, but make sure that you are not doing so at the expense of neglecting the present obedience that He has called you to.
As always, in Christ,
Andy
There was so much that I wanted to write in my last entry that I simply could not at the time. I wanted to tell you all of the amazing work that God was doing in my heart and in my life. I wanted to share with you the joy of experiencing movement toward the God-centered next thing in my life, and I wanted to share with you the pain of leaving the God-centered previous thing in my life.
During the transition process of the past two weeks I've had many come to me and say, "You're moving on to BIGGER and BETTER things." And while, from a human perspective there may be some truth to this, from a God-centered perspective this movement is only into DIFFERENT things, not bigger or better.
There is nothing BIGGER than the local church, and there is nothing BETTER than that church living out the gospel week in and week out. It is MY LOSS to leave Northlake Baptist Church after almost 4 years of service to you and the Kingdom. I hope you have learned from me, and I know that I have learned from you.
Live NOW:
Tonight I wanted to share a thought that I have often shared with my students at NSM.
It is so easy for us to view movement in this life in terms of "bigger" and "better." It is so easy to get lost in the excitement of moments like these. One week ago I was spending my final hours as the Student Pastor at NBC. One week before that I was weeping with kids that have become a real part of who I am. One week before that I officially resigned my position, and two days before that God began the two sleepless nights that would (lovingly) FORCE me to finally obey His call for me to move on.
I've always struggled with defining success in what's happening NEXT. In middle school I looked to High school. In ninth grade I looked to getting a driver's license. At sixteen I looked to graduation. At graduation I looked to college. In college I looked to marriage. In marriage I looked to having children. And so on and so forth.
And while God has certainly ordained some of this excitement and anticipation as part of our motivation to grow and learn and be changed by Him, we must be careful to not forget to Live NOW. I've often told my students that "God will not take you to a new lesson or level until you've learned the one He has for you now."
For me, there were some very specific lessons that I had to learn before moving to this next stage. Most of them are/were very personal, but one that I can share is in relation to my discipline in study.
Almost 4 months before God ultimately called me to "pack up your things and go to the place I will tell you," He began to impress upon my heart that I had gotten LAZY in my studies. I have almost always stayed disciplined in my study of the Bible itself, but I have used this as an excuse to exclude the study of other disciplines or material. I always justified it by saying, "The Bible is sufficient for all that I need to know." And while this may sound good on paper, it's a cop-out for a true leader and student. God has graciously given insight to many individuals... insight that I could not attain on my own. These precious "nuggets" are being shared with us through the medium of writers and preachers and apologists, and we should listen and soak it all in.
And so, as God has challenged me to step up my studies over the past 4 months, He was, in ways that only He can do, preparing me for the SYLLABUS SHOCK that I have gotten the past week at Southeastern.
Now I am excited by the challenge. I am motivated to be the BEST that I can be at what I do because that's what the Kingdom needs. God needs/wants us at our best. Knowing our best. Thinking our best. And DOING our best.
So, I encourage us all to Live NOW the best that you can for the glory of God and the gospel to the world. It's great to dream of the future, but make sure that you are not doing so at the expense of neglecting the present obedience that He has called you to.
As always, in Christ,
Andy
Saturday, January 16, 2010
2009 has been a year to remember. God has done some pretty amazing things this year as well as challenging me and growing me. The year started with me playing music with my brother in a band called Mathetes. We had tons of fun, but I knew from the get-go that God was challenging me to develop my own music and see where it went. By May I had formed a new band called "changing Lane," composed of Peter Diamond - drums, Bryan Hartzog - bass, and Jay Smorey - lead guitar. We played our first show in August of 2009, and stared working the same month on our first album. We completed "Boldly Afraid" the album in early November 2009, and it is set to be on iTunes and AmazongMP3 any day now. You can check out our band at http://www.changinglaneband.com/
God has also grown me a lot in my capacity for ministry in 2010. He's challenged me to step out in new areas of study, preaching, and evangelism. I'm comfortable with the first two, but that third one is still a very real challenge. One cool story about stepping out of my comfort zone: I was sitting in McDonalds in Atlanta one morning eating a bagel and reading my Bible when a dude walks by, says, "reading the Bible? whatcha readin'?", and sits down. Kinda freaked me out, but also kinda excited me. It's always to see His providence at work. After talking the guy for a little while I figured out that he was a homeless, ex-minister, who was highly trained in the Scriptures and very well-spoken and intelligent. He could quote Scripture as good or better than I could. You can see all of my little stereotypes breaking into a million pieces now. The 30 mintues or so that I spent talking to Tommy were among the most edifying and Christ-glorifying of my year. I was challenged by him. Though he had fallen off the path of righteousness, he could see that God wasn't done with him and that repentence was the way back home. I prayed with Tommy, dropped him off at a local motel, and went back to my day.
I wish all of my days were so full of clarity and purpose. Perhaps they would be were I to be available as often as I should be.
This year's Christmas was among the most special of all time. I got to see ALL of my family for the first time in a while, and each time we met together over the holidays it was so encouraging. Dad and Mom moved 3 days before Christmas, and Nick and Jessie got married 3 days after Christmas... it was a CRAZY time, but it was all well worth it.
2009 has also seen the creation of a new little one growing my wife's belly. We found out yesterday (1/15) that we WILL, in fact, be having a girl, which I have insisted was the case the whole time. Chloe Grace Duke will be her name, and I can't wait until she gets here. She's scheduled to be here June 2, but we'll see about that.
These are just a few snapshots of all that happened in 2009. I know that 2010 will open a new chapter in the Duke household. God is taking us places that we've never been before and asking us to trust like we never knew we could. He is faithful.
In Christ,
Andy
God has also grown me a lot in my capacity for ministry in 2010. He's challenged me to step out in new areas of study, preaching, and evangelism. I'm comfortable with the first two, but that third one is still a very real challenge. One cool story about stepping out of my comfort zone: I was sitting in McDonalds in Atlanta one morning eating a bagel and reading my Bible when a dude walks by, says, "reading the Bible? whatcha readin'?", and sits down. Kinda freaked me out, but also kinda excited me. It's always to see His providence at work. After talking the guy for a little while I figured out that he was a homeless, ex-minister, who was highly trained in the Scriptures and very well-spoken and intelligent. He could quote Scripture as good or better than I could. You can see all of my little stereotypes breaking into a million pieces now. The 30 mintues or so that I spent talking to Tommy were among the most edifying and Christ-glorifying of my year. I was challenged by him. Though he had fallen off the path of righteousness, he could see that God wasn't done with him and that repentence was the way back home. I prayed with Tommy, dropped him off at a local motel, and went back to my day.
I wish all of my days were so full of clarity and purpose. Perhaps they would be were I to be available as often as I should be.
This year's Christmas was among the most special of all time. I got to see ALL of my family for the first time in a while, and each time we met together over the holidays it was so encouraging. Dad and Mom moved 3 days before Christmas, and Nick and Jessie got married 3 days after Christmas... it was a CRAZY time, but it was all well worth it.
2009 has also seen the creation of a new little one growing my wife's belly. We found out yesterday (1/15) that we WILL, in fact, be having a girl, which I have insisted was the case the whole time. Chloe Grace Duke will be her name, and I can't wait until she gets here. She's scheduled to be here June 2, but we'll see about that.
These are just a few snapshots of all that happened in 2009. I know that 2010 will open a new chapter in the Duke household. God is taking us places that we've never been before and asking us to trust like we never knew we could. He is faithful.
In Christ,
Andy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)